No, because it may be possible that breaking a monolithic group into smaller blocks for analysis would show that some parts of that monolith do better than others, and even other parts of other monolithic blocks that were considered “superior”.
Sowell himself gives the example of West Indian immigrants in New York and how they fare far better than American born blacks even though they live in the same area and cannot be distinguished by sight. (From memory) Coleman Hughes, in critiquing Kendi’s position will contrast Russian whites living in the States with those of French whites in the States that show greater disparities than between whites and blacks as monolithic groups.
I've actually just stumbled across this quote from Hughes as I was reading the review he wrote[0] of Kendi's book, posted nearby in this thread[1] (though I saw him use this elsewhere, in evidence to Congress, I believe):
> This view commits him to some bizarre conclusions. For example, according to 2017 Census Bureau data, the average Haitian-American earned 68 cents for every dollar earned by the average Nigerian-American. The average French-American earned 70 cents for every dollar earned by the average Russian-American.
Sowell himself gives the example of West Indian immigrants in New York and how they fare far better than American born blacks even though they live in the same area and cannot be distinguished by sight. (From memory) Coleman Hughes, in critiquing Kendi’s position will contrast Russian whites living in the States with those of French whites in the States that show greater disparities than between whites and blacks as monolithic groups.