Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This isn’t true, suicide isn’t zero sum. If you remove easy ways of committing suicide, that method drops substantially, but overall suicides ALSO drop.

“ In the early 1960s, asphyxiation with domestic gas accounted for nearly half of suicides in England and Wales.3 The conversion of the British gas supply to North Sea gas, which was free of carbon monoxide, essentially eliminated domestic gas suicides in England and Wales and, moreover, was accompanied by a steep decline in the overall suicide rate (a 30% decline in England and Wales between 1960 and 1971, and a smaller decrease in Scotland), driven by the fall in gas suicides.”

Additionally, in the case specifically of guns, they’re more impactful for suicides BECAUSE they’re so effective. In the US they account for 1% of suicide attempts, but 50% of suicide deaths.

https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(16)30572-1/pdf




Ok - but this is a call for gun prohibition, which a lot of people keep saying nobody is calling for.


Literally no one here is calling for "prohibition". You inserted that term into the discussion yourself.


The term describes what is being discussed when people are reasoning by analogy with other things which have been eliminated from use.


> The conversion of the British gas supply to North Sea gas

There was a complete prohibition on CO containing gas. Go read the story again.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: