On: Repealing Section 230 won’t do what anyone wants

[qudchewer]

There is someone deciding on what content to post with the New York Times. If a site like twitter is engaging in that activity - then they should loose 230 immunity, because they are acting like a publisher instead of a platform. It seems relatively straight forward, doesn't it?

Seems like people aren't thinking very well these days.

[Black101 → qudchewer]

> Seems like people aren't thinking very well these days.

They are thinking that they want to control all content online, that's all.

They just aren't going to tell you that.