I'm not sure I get the logic of the article. Google AI Research is going to implode because we know what the current models can't do? I thought we do research precisely because we wanted to expand our boundary of out knowledge. That is, shouldn't a research institution implode if there is nothing to research?
And why is Gebru relevant in this article? Does she do quality research, and the research results have to do with the claimed implode?
And why is Gebru relevant in this article? Does she do quality research, and the research results have to do with the claimed implode?