Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That is nonsense and you seem to spread this misinformation in a lot of places. You should also add a disclaimer that you are part of the Arch team.

AUR: Anyone can create an account and upload PKGBUILDs. There are no checks at all. AUR users should verify whether PKGBUILDs are not malicious. In practice, a lot of people use things like yaourt to install packages from the AUR without verifying the PKGBUILDs.

nixpkgs: anyone can contribute a PR with a new package, package update, or package modification. However, changes only get added to nixpkgs after someone with commit privileges verifies the PR and merges it. Also, a common misconception is that nixpkgs package maintainers can merge changes. This is false, only a much smaller set of committers can merge changes in the actual nixpkgs repository.

nixpkgs is more like the Arch Community repository, where committers are long-time contributors with a track record of high-quality contributions. Parts of nixpkgs are like Arch Core/Extra, because they are marked using the GitHub codeowners mechanism and changes are generally not merged unless approved through the code owners.

Disclaimer: I am a nixpkgs committer, former Arch user and AUR contributor.



>That is nonsense and you seem to spread this misinformation in a lot of places. You should also add a disclaimer that you are part of the Arch team.

The AUR comment is unfair, uncalled for and adds nothing to the conversation. I apologize and hope our previous conversations have been more productive. It was meant more tongue in cheek then some grand claim about the quality of nixpkgs and stems mostly from the frustration of the entire vendoring issue.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: