Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It's typically included on lists because of the implications. One either takes the position (1) child pornography should be allowed to be shared, (2) child pornography should be suppressed, but may be shared, or (3) child pornography cannot be allowed to be shared.

(3) obviously requires very different technical solutions (like: no private encryption, ever) than (1).




I fail to see any relevance to a discussion centered around debating implications and boundaries of 'free speech.'


Do you think I should be allowed to possess encryption, through which I could share child pornography with others, without being detected?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: