It would be pseudoscience if it were to be seen as or communicated as fact. It’s not.
Any newly observed fact can falsify these theories. It just takes a long time. There’s still tons of open issues on General Relativity too. So far though, it seems to have passed every test.
Would you call GR pseudoscience too then? Since it’ll likely never be fully verified.
> would be pseudoscience if it were to be seen as or communicated as fact. It’s not.
Pseudoscience is something labelling itself as science while not adhering to scientific standards. Claiming it's a fact would be a dead giveaway though.
Relativity has been experimentally tested and made accurate predictions, it is impossible for it to be "fully verified."
Any newly observed fact can falsify these theories. It just takes a long time. There’s still tons of open issues on General Relativity too. So far though, it seems to have passed every test.
Would you call GR pseudoscience too then? Since it’ll likely never be fully verified.