Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That would ruin their plausible deniability.


My experience from other organizations:

* Corruption runs to the top.

* The top is very careful to communicate verbally, through implications, or otherwise.

Dunno about Google.


They've already been sued! Lawsuits already claims that chrome, with eg 60% US marketshare, is used as a distribution channel for google!

Any plausible deniability they have had is gone, and lawyers are in the loop for all sorts of decisions now. Not least because having counsel on a thread can help prevent that discussion from being subpoenaed.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: