Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That may be fair :)

Personally, I enjoy React on the front-end but don't currently like any back-end framework, so Reflux may well be better in aggregate.

(FWIW, I have a PhD in computer science and big part of that was on web applications and frameworks for them, combined with ~15 years commercial experience mastering web development, so this wasn't meant to be a middle-brow dismissal. As I said, it is exciting, I'm just not convinced.

I think there is some merit in the argument that too much cleverness can be dangerous. Battle-hardened is tricky; I agree TodoMVC is meant to be a minimalist demo, but if a minimal demo can have subtle bugs caused by the cleverness of the data binding, how much more so a real app with a much more complex data model?

But I guess it does eliminate whole other classes of bug, so I can believe it works less buggy and more productive better than React+some back end.

I certainly find the current front/back split endlessly painful. I am also excited by the new React Server Components which might be another good solution to that.)

EDIT TO ADD: I guess what I was trying to say is: I found this interesting, and I looked at it, and then I found this bug in the example, and I wonder if this framework might make a bug like that more likely because the power of making some things easier is obscuring what is happening in some cases, and I don't know if that trade-off is worth it.



My experience bears this out as well. Things that "just work" usually don't do that and/or come with a list of significant caveats.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: