QAnon, as malignant as it is, is a relatively small movement even among Trump supporters - probably around 1/4 of his followers.
Don't believe me? Go read thedonald.win. After you recover from the shock of realizing that many of them are planning/hoping for another assault on democracy on the 17th, you'll see that the attitude toward QAnon is not one of approval .
And I've never seen a QAnon-related or -influenced post on HN. Clearly, there are Trump supporters, although they're a very small minority here.
So yes, (Trump|QAnon) evaluates true on HN, but only because of the first term in the expression.
> QAnon, as malignant as it is, is a relatively small movement even among Trump supporters - probably around 1/4 of his followers.
I have, very much to the destruction of my soul, looked thedonald.win. It's filled to the brim with Q'isms. Donald trump himself has repeated Q'isms, and has retweeted Qanon-based tweets on numerous occasions(https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/12/trump-tweeting-qano...). At this point, you can not separate Trump supporters from the QAnon crowd, they are virtually the same crowd, not with the big T himself retweeting (well not anymore, I give you that) QAnon bunk.
I also have to say, for somebody that was clamoring for me to show the very specific amounts of very specific evidence, you counter claim now has nothing of the sort of rigor you expected of me.
Don't believe me? Go read thedonald.win. After you recover from the shock of realizing that many of them are planning/hoping for another assault on democracy on the 17th, you'll see that the attitude toward QAnon is not one of approval .
And I've never seen a QAnon-related or -influenced post on HN. Clearly, there are Trump supporters, although they're a very small minority here.
So yes, (Trump|QAnon) evaluates true on HN, but only because of the first term in the expression.