From microops to abstract resources: constructing simpler CPU performance models

[matt_d]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.11473

[alblue]

Interesting paper, but I noticed a couple of typos:

* ntel in the conclusion

* x96 in the main body

(in case the paper authors read this commentary)

[mjbrusso → alblue]

x96 has been used in context of x64 + x32 architectures

[alblue → mjbrusso]

I have never seen that term be used in this way before, nor can I find any references on that. Do you have links to be able to justify this claim?