Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If it becomes widespread; freedom of speech is irrelevent because the executive power bows down to populism.

I agree with words being able to elicit strong emotional response in people, but I disagree that this should serve as a basis for legislation. I do not think it is a strong enough basis to risk affecting the spread of ideas and discourse.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: