Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Pesticides are mentioned in the paper, but it doesn't consider it a convincing explanation, except, maybe, as a contributing factor.

But the most important part is in the summary:

> Multiple hypotheses and mechanisms have been proposed to explain these clinical cases, but evidence has been lacking, no hypothesis has been proven, and the circumstances remain unclear.

Pulsed, directed microwaves just seem to be "the most plausible mechanism". So, nothing conclusive.



From my point of view, pesticides beats directed microwaves by several orders of magnitude in the Occam's razor plausibility test.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: