> No one thinks and speaks purely in math. It must be language, then math [...]
I disagree for any non-trivial use of "language".
By that I mean that things like "wonder what will happen if I use a different boundary condition" is a trivial use of language, as it does not affect the understanding of the problem or how to solve it.
I disagree for any non-trivial use of "language".
By that I mean that things like "wonder what will happen if I use a different boundary condition" is a trivial use of language, as it does not affect the understanding of the problem or how to solve it.