In addition to what others have said about the video's author being discredited in other, similar claims, many of the statements made on the CISA are trivially true, if you stop and think. E.g.,
> Rumor: If a social media account claims an identity, the account must be run by that person or organization.
I could claim to be the King of France himself right here, right now, but that wouldn't make it so.
As Buster (the rabbit) said: Someone would do that? Just go on the Internet and lie?
As another example, the claim that a website outage could be caused by something other than hacking — is trivial to prove by thinking about it. High load — particularly on election night, likely the busiest night for an election site — can cause the site to go down.
Further, most of them are backed by citations, many to not CISA. Even if you think "it's a giant federal conspiracy" many of the claims are still trivially fact checked by punching them into Google, where non-federal and non-governmental sources further back them up. (E.g., that voter rolls are generally public can be fact-checked that way.)
> Rumor: If a social media account claims an identity, the account must be run by that person or organization.
I could claim to be the King of France himself right here, right now, but that wouldn't make it so.
As Buster (the rabbit) said: Someone would do that? Just go on the Internet and lie?
As another example, the claim that a website outage could be caused by something other than hacking — is trivial to prove by thinking about it. High load — particularly on election night, likely the busiest night for an election site — can cause the site to go down.
Further, most of them are backed by citations, many to not CISA. Even if you think "it's a giant federal conspiracy" many of the claims are still trivially fact checked by punching them into Google, where non-federal and non-governmental sources further back them up. (E.g., that voter rolls are generally public can be fact-checked that way.)