Wisp is neat, and was an inspiration for eslisp. Wisp introduces a lot of syntax, and abstractions to pretend it's on a lisp runtime, which make it harder to learn, and makes it less obvious what happened when stuff breaks. And you can't invoke the compiler inside macros. Those are the things I've tried to improve in eslisp.
Finding traction for a new language is difficult. It requires quite a large mass of work, documentation, and polish, before people view it as stable enough to invest their time in.
For now, I'm happy even if eslisp is viewed as a convoluted experiment. If it dies, perhaps like I found Wisp and had ideas, someone will find this and have ideas. Projects die, progress continues.
Finding traction for a new language is difficult. It requires quite a large mass of work, documentation, and polish, before people view it as stable enough to invest their time in.
For now, I'm happy even if eslisp is viewed as a convoluted experiment. If it dies, perhaps like I found Wisp and had ideas, someone will find this and have ideas. Projects die, progress continues.