Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

From a business perspective, this is an irrelevant distinction. The requirement was satisfied in a different way, i.e. the engineers satisfying the requirement were replaced by GPT-3, the tool which satisfies the requirement.

I think everyone understood that.




The thread is not about business perspective, it's about the hype around what GPT-3 is and is not able to do.

One thing GPT-3 is not able to do for example, is replacing 2 ML engineers to build a GPT-3 like model. But OpenAI can do that.


It’s not clear what you are trying to say.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: