> Also, why doesn't TSMC slap a license on every IC that leaves their fab, taking (say) a 30% profit from every application in which their ICs are being used?
Because companies would stop using TSMC chips...?
Not to mention the logistical problems to attribute "profit" to any chip in particular.
For GPUs, I agree that you currently have to use TSMC. But if TSMC were to charge 30% of profits, you would almost certainly see a migration to other fabs which would harm TSMC's long-term profitability.
Give it 10 years and a lot of engineering time, maybe half a trillion USD and you'll get the equivalent in the mainland US. Until then, it's more convenient to use the US military resource to protect Taiwan from PRoC.
Because companies would stop using TSMC chips...?
Not to mention the logistical problems to attribute "profit" to any chip in particular.