Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

* instead of sending a stream of pixel-packed images, it sends specific reference points on the image around the eyes, nose, and mouth*

So they're trading bandwidth for CPU load at either end. I wonder what the tradeoff is in terms of energy? Would this result in higher CO2 emissions?



Maybe but you're discounting the energy required to send those 99% of pixels over the network. Just because it's not your CPU doesn't mean it's not doing work.


Indeed, in the case of LTE comms and mobile chips the difference in power usage is greater than six orders of magnitude.


Or maybe lower since less data is transmitted?


> So they're trading bandwidth for CPU load at either end

Given it's Nvidia I would imagine it's more likely going to be GPU load rather than CPU load. Don't underestimate the current computational overhead of existing lossy video compression.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: