This might have gotten more attention here if the link tet didn't contain educational research jargon. Seems like a serious literature review, though, at a glance.
Plenty of YN posts contain domain specific jargon from physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology, and various computing sub disciplines. I don’t see that educational jargon in a paper intended for practitioners in that field should be any different.
Nintil.com author here. I'm no education researcher, but I think the post is relatively jargon free, other than the jargon I deliberately introduce after explaining what it is I think.
