On: The Spite Software License

[badrabbit]

Debatable. The lawyer is working for his clients therefore his reading of the file binds the company to its conditions.

[natcombs → badrabbit]

Alternative: Publish a blog about the spite license, and then anyone who reads the blog knows the contents, but has not read the license itself!

[beckingz → natcombs]

License-rolling?

[zimpenfish → badrabbit]

Surely only if the lawyer agrees to it? Otherwise this would mean just reading contracts to check them out for validity would end up being binding - which is a bit much.