Observational error is always a good speculation. It seems to be at the heart of most of these "impossible physics" stories.
Remember not long ago when neutrinos were thought to have been observed moving faster than the speed of light? Cold fusion?
Before people jump on the idea of re-evaluating Einstein's theories, it's always good to get more people looking at the data, independently verifying it, thinking about it. In a few months, it's likely that this blip will disappear like most others.
Remember not long ago when neutrinos were thought to have been observed moving faster than the speed of light? Cold fusion?
Before people jump on the idea of re-evaluating Einstein's theories, it's always good to get more people looking at the data, independently verifying it, thinking about it. In a few months, it's likely that this blip will disappear like most others.