You’re framing your preference for openness as a choice and another’s preference for regulation as “having no choice” which is exactly the problem I was trying to highlight. You see your option as the only option so all others are a mistake, and so are dictating what options are available (is only yours). Do you not see this is removing people’s choice? Especially if already today there are other ecosystems that cater to your desire?
I do not make such a framing, the choice i describe is about what to install in your device - this assumes the ability is already there. I do not refer to having the ability itself as a choice.
