Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't know why this is such a shock to people reading HN. EULAs have always granted a license to use typically on a single computer. They have never granted a license to own (would gladly be proven wrong if someone has an example). It's not your code. You can't own it. I'm sure they are concerned about having to support the legacy code. Yes, converting to 100% subscription based users, but if they can pull the plug on any responsibility to support old code, that would be ideal for them.



No one is shocked by bad behavior, but just because something isn't surprising doesn't mean it's not worthy of discussion.


Would it? Great. Let's just all applaud, justify and support what is best for all corporations and see where we get with that, nay?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: