According to the left-leaning watchdog Sourcewatch, Fee has connections to the Koch Brothers. Further, the Least Biased Public Integrity also ties this organization to the Koch Bothers via funding.
The article keeps cherry picking particularly hard hit countries as a comparison to Sweden, instead of e.g. its closest neighbors Denmark (comparable hit to GDP, less than 20% of the deaths) or Finland (smaller hit to GDP, less than 15% of the deaths). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/10545332/2-1...
We should be able to digest information without epistemological hand holding.
I've found that most fact check sites have an agenda of their own. A common technique is to misattribute or deliberately misinterpret a claim and then debunk the strawman.
>"Donald Trump falsely claimed Clinton “acid washed” 33,000 personal emails ... Clinton’s tech team used BleachBit, which is a free software program. It does not use chemicals."
You "found"? Stats, research notes, facts, data? ... opinions are not facts.
About your selective and misleading choice of fact checked, you know very well it's about the "acid wash" claim, and not about what the republicans did. You don't need a fact checker to know what Trump said about Hilary and the mail server, nor why it was used and perused so relentlessnesly.
Nor have you demonstrated that 'fact check' sites are without bias.
I've provided a quote and a link to one of the more memorable instances of what I found to be disingenuous fact checking. I'm not sure what else you can expect in this context?
also, see notes:
According to the left-leaning watchdog Sourcewatch, Fee has connections to the Koch Brothers. Further, the Least Biased Public Integrity also ties this organization to the Koch Bothers via funding.