They didn't have a large majority consider them inferior for long, or being bitter that they are not longer their slaves (like they were for their grandparents and earlier) and thinking "how dare they not know their place".
Those immigrants also didn't have seggregation laws against them until the 70s...
"...we find large place effects on individual economic outcomes like income, education, socioeconomic status, house prices, and housing quality. People assigned to richer locations do better on all measures. Random location assignment affected intergenerational economic outcomes as well, with families assigned to more socially mobile areas... displaying lower cross-generational correlation in outcomes."[1]
> They didn't have a large majority consider them inferior for long
Arguably untrue, ask a Trump voter of your choice about whether they think Chinese or Latino looking people are inferior to whites...
> seggregation laws against them until the 70s
All the SV hiring we are talking about is people born in the 80s and 90s. How are those worse off than the SE Asian or middle eastern first/second generation immigrant who also possibly gets racially stereotyped in some places but doesn't have preferential privileged college admissions and special scholarships?
Those immigrants also didn't have seggregation laws against them until the 70s...