> Maybe one third of internal apps developed in the last years don’t work at all outside of Chrome, the page remains blank or has broken widgets all over the place.
Does this statistic match what others have seen? If so, that’s staggering, and unfortunate. I know there are more sites that do this than there used to be, but I wasn’t under the impression it was such a large proportion.
I can confirm that this is the case within JPMC. Old things only work in IE and new things have been tested most in chrome. But this stat is quite high just because chrome is the “strategic” solution so it is seen as unnecessary to make things work elsewhere.
As a devout Firefox user it is frustrating (especially being told your web browser is no longer supported).
They are setting themselves up to eventually migrate to Edge so that one web browser can access both the old legacy sites and the new stuff.
Does this statistic match what others have seen? If so, that’s staggering, and unfortunate. I know there are more sites that do this than there used to be, but I wasn’t under the impression it was such a large proportion.