>from assumptions about machine architecture, you can use emulators
That is exactly NOT true, since there is no 100% correct emulation around, think of x64 emulation with integrated Meltdown, if you don't know about meltdown your emulation has no implementation for it.
Look you made a perfect counterargument, using unreliable hardware...with your words you could just test it with unreliable emulation ;)
>unreliable hardware... how frequently servers
Wait...server's and unreliable do not match together...and then the BMC argument..sound's bit crazy to me.
That is exactly NOT true, since there is no 100% correct emulation around, think of x64 emulation with integrated Meltdown, if you don't know about meltdown your emulation has no implementation for it.
Look you made a perfect counterargument, using unreliable hardware...with your words you could just test it with unreliable emulation ;)
>unreliable hardware... how frequently servers
Wait...server's and unreliable do not match together...and then the BMC argument..sound's bit crazy to me.