Meh, the analogy breaks down too early for it to be useful or scary. Viruses infect you whether you choose to be infected or not. You can choose the type of information you read. You can use your rational thought to process what is in front of you. You can decided whether or not it is valuable, true, helpful, insightful, and so on.
If the point of this "meditation" is to show that freedom of speech is bad, then they need to prove the assumption that a lack of freedom of speech leads to higher quality information and less manipulation of the truth. History has proven otherwise.
If the point of this "meditation" is to show that freedom of speech is bad, then they need to prove the assumption that a lack of freedom of speech leads to higher quality information and less manipulation of the truth. History has proven otherwise.