Perhaps the problem is that you aren’t making much of an effort to be well understood? Not to be rude, but your writing is so bad that I’m genuinely struggling to make sense of it.
What you seem to be saying is that morality is subjective, and therefore it should be immune from critical scrutiny. Am I off base?
What you seem to be saying is that morality is subjective, and therefore it should be immune from critical scrutiny. Am I off base?