> Somewhat ironically, or at least counterintuitively, the US military specifically avoids relying on GNSS for navigating ICBMs, smart-bombs, cruise missiles, or any other systems that must operate in contested airspace
The DoD has been purchasing GPS guided munitions for years because of the economics. They’re significantly cheaper than laser guidance kits and don’t require a persistent designation paint. The downside (besides jamming) is that they’re more subject to user error: I can recall at least one incident where users entered incorrect coordinates and essentially bombed themselves.
They use GPS, sure, otherwise what's the point of having it?
But they can't rely on it being available, especially during a major conflict. So most weapon delivery systems require different forms of navigation to be available, even if GPS is cheaper and preferred.
The DoD has been purchasing GPS guided munitions for years because of the economics. They’re significantly cheaper than laser guidance kits and don’t require a persistent designation paint. The downside (besides jamming) is that they’re more subject to user error: I can recall at least one incident where users entered incorrect coordinates and essentially bombed themselves.