Why don't companies come out and tell people what they're doing these days? Telemetry is getting to the point where people such as doctors and lawyers might be violating the law by using a modern computer. And people in the defense industry? Doesn't Apple employ thousands of forns? Who's audited their datasystems and ensured that this stuff stays private?
Much easier and better to just stop using it all and move to a system like Linux or BSD. 99% of people do everything in a browser these days anyhow.
If only moving to Linux were an option for everyone.
The other day I tried for the 100th time to move to Linux. I installed a recent build of a maintained, popular distribution (no it doesn't matter which one - I have tried them all), on hardware that is famous for it's Linux support.
Everything worked for a day and a half, then the sound just fucking died. No input or output.
I get millions of people use Linux daily, and are happy with it -- I'm genuinely grateful that's a thing. I would love to also use Linux, but I really don't have the time to diagnose why it broke yet again.
Any suggestions for people stuck on macOS? I guess I could block all Apple domains in my DNS resolver? Other than app updates, I can't think of anything that would stop working. That still sounds less painful than trying to deal with Linux's atrocious UX.
Sure, though I am describing my latest attempt in like 15 years of using Linux on and off. At some point "every OS has its problems" just stopped being true for me.
Linux really sucks for anything other than servers. I hate to say that because I badly wish it weren't true, but it is.
A Linux conference is usually focused on the Linux kernel, drivers, filesystems, networking, more or less everything POSIXy.
If you want to learn about improvements at the UI level, there are XDG, GUADEC, Kacademy, each focused on their own silo, and other parts of the stack or UI tooling don't have any at all.
Meanwhile WWDC, Google IO, BUILD / Ignite are about all levels of the stack.
I've had good luck with System76 & PopOS, they put in the extra effort to make sure Linux just works on the hardware they sell and will respond to any tech support issues. Recently switched back to running Debian desktop on a older system and have ran into some intermittent sound issues that are frustrating, so I can relate but haven't had that kind of issue with any of the System76 laptops I've used.
Spin up a Linux box in macOS and ssh into it directly. It is a true joy if you are comfortable working with text files (programming, admin, focused writing, etc.)
It will default to using VirtualBox as the underlying virtualization. That works a treat and hides all the GUI madness of VirtualBox.
However, if you open up VirtualBox then you can interact with the host you just created with “vagrant up” just fine, including using a graphical environment.
Personally I prefer VMWare Fusion for linux visualization. There are a number of tweaks that it comes with and I never really feel like anything is impossible. It may be poorly documented at times (custom networking, say) but it's all possible and it handles retina really well.
Had various Linux distributions running on bare metal on my MacBook Pro 2011 for most of its life. It has barely had sound issues in that time. My Bluetooth headphones work best with my Linux machine, Windows 10 won't let me use both microphone and headphones together in a call. Absolutely atrocious, Windows.
Do you have an obscure sound card or something? With consumer grade hardware I have rarely had issues with compatibility. Well yes recently with wifi USB adaptors.
I got a purism laptop that has carefully chosen hardware. All the hardware has blob-free drivers.
It has worked very well for me. I originally installed qubes years ago, but it was all the security of vm/containers with 1/10th of the convenience. I switched to arch, it was a completely painless install and that's what I have now.
(hardware-wise it is more of the same - standardized screws on the case, 19v power adapter with standard barrel jack, socketed standard memory, m.2, sata)
Yeah, I bought something similar to that. The entire machine can run off the Linux kernel with zero proprietary drivers. Unfortunately even that didn't help me with my bad luck so far.
I have decided to give up trying Linux, at-least for a few years.
I mean, sound not working is pretty user hostile too. But yeah, I have come to the conclusion Linux isn't right for me. Sadly neither is Windows, and macOS is rapidly getting worse.
Multiple mothers in my family use Linux. The volume and nature of tech support questions are often not OS-specific. Last issue I dealt with was a dusty DVD Drive that needed to be replaced.
> Why don't companies come out and tell people what they're doing these days?
It's a mystery. I'd certainly be much more willing to buy a machine if it came with good documentation. Back in the 1980's, they (Apple and others) used to include complete schematics for their computers.
I don't know about BSD, but even "mainstream" Linux (i.e. Ubuntu and the like) has telemetry now. This sort of spyware is everywhere. I think Windows 10 was the first to really normalise such behaviour on the desktop, and all the others just followed along.
where people such as doctors and lawyers might be violating the law by using a modern computer
That reminds me of a story I heard not long ago --- a company wanted to have more defense against malware, so signed up for a "security solution" from one of the big vendors and got it installed on all the company's machines. After a developer who was doing network tracing discovered that it was phoning home on every executable being run, and further digging discovered that it was periodically uploading file hashes and sometimes actual files --- not just the executables being run but other random files --- to the security vendor's servers, the reaction was "oh hell no!" and they immediately terminated the service and removed the product from all their machines.
Are you certain about this? I think I was being conservative.
It's easy for us tech nerds in our little gadget bubbles to suppose that everybody is like us. But most people are simple browser users, and Office 365 and Google Docs have all but killed off office software on the desktop for many users.
On the contrary, it's easy in our tech bubble to assume that everybody else uses a computer just for mail, netflix and spreadsheets, when in reality most people have niche needs. It's just that there are many niches. E.g. I know people from scientific circles who use CAS software I've never even heard of, my sister is an architect and needs to use CAD software. YouTube video authors often use advanced video editing software. Musicians use audio editing software. Publishers use Adobe InDesign. Then there are gamers. This "not geek => mainly spreadsheet user" stereotype is really strange.
And basically everybody, whom I know personally, complains about the UX of anything web-based, so don't even think about putting CAD, CAS or InDesign into the browser.
> But most people are simple browser users, and Office 365 and Google Docs have all but killed off office software on the desktop for many users.
In reality, I see most people use desktop software instead of the browser (without using the internet in some cases) to do their work. (Think CAD, Adobe, DAW software, Excel, video production software) even on mobile/tablets Office can be used where no internet connection is available.
I seriously doubt that users would spend all their time in a browser window other than for consumption purposes like social media and video sites. The idea of 99% of people doing everything in the browser seems questionable to me and some data about this would be helpful here.
Apart from the computer science department, I also doubt that people would find it easier to go to Linux, BSD or the other galaxy of distros.
> Office 365 and Google Docs have all but killed off office software on the desktop for many users.
That hasn't been my experience at all. While those tools are definitely used - especially for collaboration - most people on my company's Office 365 subscription are downloading and using the full products for their daily work. This is true in both very large companies and the (non-tech) startup I work at now.
Honestly my experience with collaboration with Office 365 last year was pretty beer bad. At least for sight technical cases people they are many better solutions.
I work in an office that mostly uses Office, but doesn't use the web version for everything. Microsoft never fully implements everything when they make a substitute, so you're always faced with a case-by-case choice as to which one. And the software people use includes things that aren't part of the basic apps, like Project, PowerPoint, Visio, I don't know what else.
The ball is actually not in my court. The original claim 99% should be somehow substantiated. It is not. On a practical note desktop software is being used by countless professionals. There is nearly infinite amount of those tools in countless areas. Amount of small businesses is insane as well and you can hardly find one without some old PC/Laptop running some of their desktop software. None of that would exist if there was no market. 99% claim does not really fit into the picture.
You mean, like all the software that has been written since companies got into the habit of embedding telemetry in everything? That crappy software?
Telemetry has a specific use-case. Taking measurements in a place you can't go. What industry employs it for nowadays is much closer to spyware in the sense you can get so much more of it done without it producing a noticeable effect for the user in terms of how much work their computer is actually doing. So what if you spin through a couple rounds of telemetry gathering while the user's process is blocked, am I right? Not like they're using it. /s
Much easier and better to just stop using it all and move to a system like Linux or BSD. 99% of people do everything in a browser these days anyhow.