> But given that they had the bug, Chrome was absolutely in the right to deny them the first time.
This is not a given at all.
Google's communication was and is absolutely unclear on what is their problem.
And if you'd take their communication on their word (dumb idea), they have been pretty clear that this was in fact not, "the bug", and that is has in fact not "been fixed".
Regardless of your (and my) opinion about apps requiring access to every site on the www -- Google did exactly the opposite of indicating that this was the problem why PushBullet is threatened to get kicked off the Play Store.
This is not a given at all.
Google's communication was and is absolutely unclear on what is their problem.
And if you'd take their communication on their word (dumb idea), they have been pretty clear that this was in fact not, "the bug", and that is has in fact not "been fixed".
Regardless of your (and my) opinion about apps requiring access to every site on the www -- Google did exactly the opposite of indicating that this was the problem why PushBullet is threatened to get kicked off the Play Store.