Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That claim is worthless when the software is closed source. It's impossible to verify.



Claims aren't worthless, they'd be breaking the law if they lied. Apple has a pretty decent incentive to not break the law (PR mostly, but also fines), so I would bet they're telling the truth here.


And as we all know, and history shows, those incentives ensure corporations never break the law.


If security researchers couldn't audit closed source software they would be pretty rubbish at their jobs. It's a lot easier to audit open source of course, but researchers do reverse engineer closed source stuff all the time.


Well you can always look at the network packets, most easily accomplished from jailbroken devices. There are many people who look at such matters. It's far from worthless.


Can't Apple push silent code updates to specific phones? That would mean they can access that data whenever they choose to. Even if they don't do it right now, they retain that ability.


Actually the claim is worth a big payday if you can prove Apple lied. One leak of customer data and Apple is screwed.


>One leak of customer data and Apple is screwed.

Yes, the Equifax incident really showed us how data leaks ruin companies.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: