Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Thats 4.8% annualized. The real figure is 1.17% for 3 months.

It's quite impressively small really, considering everyone is sitting at home, and many aren't working at all.




Not when you factor in that shutdowns didn't really start until the very end of the quarter. According to Wikipedia[1], earliest state stay-at-home order was March 19 in California and 19 states either waited until April or never issued a stay-at-home order.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._state_and_local_governmen...


It wasn't just large government shutdowns. It was local governments taking action, people traveling less, businesses cancelling/denying trips, people eating out less, etc. All of that started weeks before the large scale shutdowns.


Let's assume that 2 weeks of Q1 were significantly impacted. Let's make the very poor assumption that it scales linearly. That would imply that in Q2, we'll have about a -7% GDP, -28% annualized.


Keep in mind that this is a Q1 total and the bulk of Q1 was unaffected by coronavirus.


Skews towards the end of the quarter, probably. Much steeper drop in Q2 coming.


That's a weird way of doing the numbers.

If I get murdered in December, it's not super helpful to note that I was 92% alive on average that year.


Sometimes analogies are clever in that they simplify a concept, I'm not sure you got there.

you are either dead or alive. Economic growth is a percentage.


The economy kinda died at the end of the quarter. Averaging in Jan/Feb's numbers don't reflect that well.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: