"Whenever you use the web search, it checks it against your Google bookmarks. You can easily imagine what problems can come up when you have a several 10 or even 100 thousands of bookmarks…"
Am I mistaken to believe that unless they are using a poor algorithm, 100k bookmarks to add to their index shouldn't be a problem. What am I missing here?
I don't know, but whether they do or not shouldn't matter. They should design it so it can scale, 100k bookmarks is not really that big of a dataset for anyone, let alone G.
I don't see why they can't just fix this instead of asking him to revoke his plugin, especially if people are using it. It's needlessly removing a use case which may gain traction.
Of course they may know something I don't and which isn't mentioned in the article which makes doing any of this infeasible or undesirable.
Am I mistaken to believe that unless they are using a poor algorithm, 100k bookmarks to add to their index shouldn't be a problem. What am I missing here?