Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

My understanding is, unlike any other government agency or business, the USPS is required by law to fully fund 50 years of pensions. If that requirement were removed, it would be fine.



Businesses are required to fund their pension obligations.

In any case USPS hasn't actually fully funded their pensions since the recession.


They’re required to PRE-fund the pensions which private businesses are not required to do


Of course private businesses are required to pre-fund their pensions (with some exceptions like religious organizations).

It's a requirement under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

Lots more info here: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ebauer/2020/04/14/post-office-p...


I totally agree with you, but why is it a problem right now? Parcel volumes are at dizzying heights.


According to the article revenue from advertising (junk mail) is down 40% while local businesses are mostly closed.


This is an anecdote not data, but I've heard several USPS delivery folks mention that a lot of long-tenured drivers decided to take vacation and sick time when the lockdown started ramping up. This has caused other drivers to pick up the slack so there may be a lot of overtime getting paid out.


This doesn't wash. If advertising is down 40% and parcel services are up 150%, that's a substantial revenue increase overall.

https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/financials/annual-reports/...

I can't get the numbers to add up here. Even with letters down, advertising down then their revenue should either be flat or have a slight increase based on my guesstimate for their increase in parcel business.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: