I would fully expect the movement to gain strength.
Some balance needs to be found between risk and cost so that the people that are not at risk don't have to carry the brunt of the costs.
Because that's really where this is going, we a ruining the youth, take away their prospects yet they are not the ones that would be primarily impacted.
No, it's not. I'm not saying that people losing their relatives are somehow more impacted than those who die. I'm simply saying that you can't say that categories of people more likely to survive an infection aren't impacted.
Some balance needs to be found between risk and cost so that the people that are not at risk don't have to carry the brunt of the costs.
Because that's really where this is going, we a ruining the youth, take away their prospects yet they are not the ones that would be primarily impacted.