Given the current news cycle, this headline heavily implies that Zoom's lack of privacy/security was somehow responsible for the activist being caught, but I couldn't find anything about that aspect in the article itself.
The story is significant in its own right, but I'm exhausted by NYTimes' accelerating descent into clickbait.
You want to know what happens to Israelis who are “suspected” of talking to Palestinians, or foreigners who arrive or leave Israel and are suspected of having done that?
Given the sheer number of both Israeli and foreign NGOs and activists that do it on a daily basis and that quite a large number of non-Jewish Israeli residents and citizen have families in the territories - nothing.
Heck before the situation in Syria had escalated out to an all out war it wasn’t unheard of for Israeli Druze to wed Syrian nationals.
Not exactly. They were arrested by the government. Now, I don't hold governments in very high regard, and certainly don't think the arrest is legitimate, but it's as though you had said that if the German police arrested some people then "it's the fault of the CDU - the group that arrested them".
The story is significant in its own right, but I'm exhausted by NYTimes' accelerating descent into clickbait.