I don't buy their approach here unfortunately. They showed that they pushed the whole product without one person raising this as an issue easier. Even though this is the most common problem with block lists in real world: the LGBT sites and sexual health information sites. "We fixed it, it's ok now" - let's see how long that lasts / what's the next category to get impacted - I haven't seen any fixes in the process / validation described in the post. (I mean validation of their sources/approach in the future beyond a spot check on regressions)
Did you read the post? They obviously went and reviewed what was going to be included in that list before continuing, then just mixed up the list that was used in the final result. That's an understandable thing to miss when testing...
Yes. They still released a product without validating the issue where many other products of this category fail. Maybe it's a stupid mistake. But it really reduces my trust in how much they pay attention to this project.
its a free service that they are providing as a social good in a strange time when more parents and more kids are spending more time on the internet than ever before. It wasn't malicious, there was no harm done, and like everyone else their resources are at leas unbalanced if not constrained right now.
