Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I grew up with the puritanical mindset of: "Your intrinsic worth as a human is the money you earn; because the money you earn is from how hard you work; and how hard you work is a reflection of your intrinsic Virtue."

Thus I grew up in a family that loathes the unemployed. I really hope -- though I have grave doubts -- that this event gets through to them, so that they can have some personal growth, too.




I think loathing the unemployed (especially if it isn't caused by health conditions and isn't temporary, like in this case) is commonplace in any society. There are many studies which show unemployed people are more likely to commit crimes. e.g. [1]

Unemployed people, by definition, are net consumers. [2] Unless society as a whole actually produces wealth, there is nothing to tax, and the government doesn't have any money to spend. And how does wealth get created without people in employment? Unless you are the country with the reserve currency, which effectively gives you the ability to keep printing money until the world catches up to the con. Which doesn't still change the underlying economics, it is just that at any given point in time there is always some country which will be using the reserve currency status to make it appear like you can create wealth by printing more money.

Aiming for more employment is a net positive to any society, and I think that is what conditions people to loathe the permanently unemployed.

[1] https://www.jstor.org/stable/40057352?seq=1

[2] I remember reading an essay by PG about how getting employment is when you go from being a "net consumer" to become a "net producer", cannot find the link.


> I think loathing the unemployed (especially if it isn't caused by health conditions and isn't temporary, like in this case) is commonplace in any society. There are many studies which show unemployed people are more likely to commit crimes. e.g. [1]

Similarly, there are studies showing that rich people are less ethical. https://www.pnas.org/content/109/11/4086

> Unemployed people, by definition, are net consumers.

How do you define a "net consumer"? The only resource to consume on this planet is its ecosystem. Are unemployed people consuming more of our ecosystem than employed ones? I don't think so.

A lot of free software has been created by people not in employment. So the idea that unemployed people cannot be contributing value to society is false.


Landlords are bigger parasites than any NEET.


I've encountered exactly two people in my life who were perfectly healthy, both mentally and physically, but just sat around all day doing nothing for years on end.

Both were landlords.


That is the saddest thing I've ever read on this site. I know there's people who believe that but it's still shocking to me.


This is the view among most Americans, reinforced by the word 'un'employed which suggests that the default condition is for someone to be employed.


Perhaps not the default but it is the norm. Regardless of semantics we should be pushing UBI for exactly these instances.


"Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think." -Ayn Rand

I was also raised in a family like this.


One of my big hopes is at the end of this mess, the Protestant Work Ethic and Prosperity Gospel go down in flames.

This event should show anyone with even a bit of sense that your 'virtue' is only a small part of your economic power.


Sadly everyone seems to be doubling down on their existing strong opinions.

(Any ideas to improve that?)


People learn through hardship. We haven't experienced hardship yet.


At my day job and can't talk in detail now, but yes.


Can’t wait to hear it.



I think this is wrongly attributed as puritanical


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestant_work_ethic it's well known enough to be a common phrase, with it's own wiki entry.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: