> What you're saying is you don't believe because (a) she's a woman...
Just as you argue edw has an ungenerous interpretation, you make a far more blatant ungenerous interpretation in suggesting he's a misogynist. That really isn't necessary. I think the point he's trying to make is that it's full of over-generalizations, which is fair.
Just as you argue edw has an ungenerous interpretation, you make a far more blatant ungenerous interpretation in suggesting he's a misogynist. That really isn't necessary. I think the point he's trying to make is that it's full of over-generalizations, which is fair.