Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Natural spread is way inferior to artificial spread. By doing it artificially you can control exactly who gets it, can monitor them more easily, and can prevent the vulnerable from getting it. And you can very precisely control the rate of spread.



This only works if people do what they're told, and re-infection rates are low & slow - and we suspect they neither is the case.


.. but meanwhile the natural spread is going on?

It's a bit like saying a controlled burn can stop a forest fire - it's true, but it can easily get lost in the scale when you have an Australian or Californian situation and half the state is on fire.


In either case you need to put a quarantine in place. But with artificial spread, it's needed for a much shorter duration.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: