On: Peter Norvig's Economic Simulation (2018)

[fizixer]

> You’re assuming the 4-6% growth is a given ...

I only assumed that to be charitable to OC's argument. If we don't assume that, then OC's criticism of Norvig's simulation assumptions is even more invalid (only slightly so though; it's already invalid enough).

[simonh → fizixer]

Oh the OCs argument is silly, the simulation is about share of wealth not absolute wealth.