> Just because you don't like the content I post doesn't invalidate it.
Correct, that's why I posted a link to a scientific study that actually does invalidate this one 2005 study that you clearly cherry-picked. Why don't you post that meta-analysis or one of the other studies it cited to demonstrate that you're actually interested in legitimate science and not demagoguery?
Correct, that's why I posted a link to a scientific study that actually does invalidate this one 2005 study that you clearly cherry-picked. Why don't you post that meta-analysis or one of the other studies it cited to demonstrate that you're actually interested in legitimate science and not demagoguery?