Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Could you end up with a lossy format just by truncating a FLIF? The Adam7 comparison shows it as looking reasonable at about 5% transfer.



I think yes. From their site: https://flif.info/responsive.html

> A FLIF image can be loaded in different ‘variations’ from the same source file, by loading the file only partially. This makes it a very appropriate file format for responsive web design. Since there is only one file, the browser can start downloading the beginning of that file immediately, even before it knows exactly how much detail will be needed. The download or file read operations can be stopped as soon as sufficient detail is available, and if needed, it can be resumed when for whatever reason more detail is needed — e.g. the user zooms in or decides to print the page.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: