Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I presume the red is unilateral, meaning they don't (immediately) change the other side to green in response.


Even still, much like in India where drivers will learn to ignore the the punishing light, it could be drivers in France will learn that running reds does not increase a chance of collision because it’s only a signal of speed.


Increasing a chance of collision or not is not the same as losing a minute over a traffic light or annoying a few people. It does not appeal to the same emotions, it has a much deeper meaning.

I believe the comparison is flawed.


It only has to increase the chance of getting a really expensive ticket and points on your license to discourage that.


When a light turns yellow, a driver has to make a very quick calculus of a number of factors, including estimating stopping duration and distance, traffic presence, penalties, even judgement from other drivers. Some people will place more weight on one or another of those factors. If there is any significant portion of the population that places weight on "this isn't a real red light; it is only meant as a nagging signal" then it seems that the chances of a miscalculation (and high-speed collision) become greater overall.


The obvious solution would be to combine each nagging signal with a red-light camera, at which point it becomes very "real".


Yeah that makes it a lot safer. But still, what if two cars are approaching the signal and they end up rear ending?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: