Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The counter-argument to liquid-layouts is the fact that you need to specify a min-width which is not supported in all browsers (easy fix for jscript sure, but certainly not hack-free).

So for individuals like myself, who run at 1920x1200, legibility is a significant issue unless I manually resize my browser window which is about as much of a pain in the ass as scrolling horizontally.

Sadly, there is no perfect solution when designing for the web. Horses for courses.



> min-width which is not supported in all browsers

There's a very simple workaround. Reference a transparent, one pixel image and specify the desired minimum width.


At that resolution, you'd be somewhat insane to maximize your browser window. You should be using software that divides your screen into regions.


In OSX, the layering nature of windows to make drag-n-drop more usable sometimes becomes counter-productive.

There are times when I find I just want to focus on a single item and block everything else out, which forces me to either maximize Safari, or close down all my applications.

I don't care for Spaces too much right now, it's kind of buggy with Photoshop/Illustrator.


If you haven't already, you might want to give Think a try. It runs on OS X and might be exactly what you're looking for.

http://freeverse.com/apps/app/?id=7013


I'm a fan of the multi-monitor model. Two 20" LCDs are often cheaper than one 40" (not the same area, I know) and can be much more useful. My typical setups are:

screen one: rotated vertical with code

screen two: horizontal with command line and the app splitting horizontal real estate.

--------------------------

screen one: full-sized game

screen two: web browser and IM client




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: