On: Ask HN: What is the stigma against Wikipedia as an official reference

[gshdg]

> and have it peer reviewed and approved

That’s the part that matters.

[thasaleni → gshdg]

It could be argued that wikipedia has better reviews cause it has a much wider audience of reviewers

[gshdg → thasaleni]

Maybe, but my experience editing there is that the very vast majority of edits do not get reviewed at all, let alone by people with any background in the subject at hand.