> You asserted that currently the app downloads and is usable in 10 seconds. It is not. That's my contention, based on DF, and that is where the confusion lied in your comment.
On the contrary, my first comment was:
"He's right it's slow to let you interact. He's dead wrong that it doesn't download in the background."
Furthermore, I provided my own timings, none of which "asserted" it's usable in 10 seconds.
Again, I agree with Gruber it's slow. I disagree with you that I read him wrong. He did fail to acknowledge the app is engineered to download most of the issue in the background after (too slowly, whether 45 seconds or 80) allowing interactivity to begin.
Discussing this any further risks becoming circular.
On the contrary, my first comment was:
"He's right it's slow to let you interact. He's dead wrong that it doesn't download in the background."
Furthermore, I provided my own timings, none of which "asserted" it's usable in 10 seconds.
Again, I agree with Gruber it's slow. I disagree with you that I read him wrong. He did fail to acknowledge the app is engineered to download most of the issue in the background after (too slowly, whether 45 seconds or 80) allowing interactivity to begin.
Discussing this any further risks becoming circular.